welcome to peace! به صلح خوش امد بگویید!

please read  the important following article By Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times April 27, 2012, 5:28 p.m. beneath this persian preface! about peaceful relation and talks between iran and 5+1 and iran and usa.

جوانه های امید  کسب توافق نهایی بین ایران و 1+5 و بویژه بین ایران و امریکا  و در مورد برنامه هسته ای و پذیرش حق غنی سازی در ایران و نهایتا جلوگیری  و پرهیز از جنگ فاجعه بار  احتمالی برای منطقه و جهان هر روز بارورتر می گردد. بخصوص که دور بعدی مذاکرات قرار است در سوم خرداد جاری در بغداد برگزار گرددو اعلام مذاکره جدید بین  ایران با اژانس بین المللی انرژی هسته ای در ماه جاری همه و همه جوی مطلوب را بوجود اورده است . بهمین دلیل همه ناظران سیاسی جهان با خوشبینی فراوان به این مذاکرات می نگرند. البته متاسفانه جنگ طلبان نا اگاه

.

please read  the important following article By Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times April 27, 2012, 5:28 p.m. beneath this persian preface! about peaceful relation and talks between iran and 5+1 and iran and usa.

جوانه های امید  کسب توافق نهایی بین ایران و 1+5 و بویژه بین ایران و امریکا  و در مورد برنامه هسته ای و پذیرش حق غنی سازی در ایران و نهایتا جلوگیری  و پرهیز از جنگ فاجعه بار  احتمالی برای منطقه و جهان هر روز بارورتر می گردد. بخصوص که دور بعدی مذاکرات قرار است در سوم خرداد جاری در بغداد برگزار گرددو اعلام مذاکره جدید بین  ایران با اژانس بین المللی انرژی هسته ای در ماه جاری همه و همه جوی مطلوب را بوجود اورده است . بهمین دلیل همه ناظران سیاسی جهان با خوشبینی فراوان به این مذاکرات می نگرند. البته متاسفانه جنگ طلبان نا اگاه

 و نادان در بعضی از کشورههای عربی و غیر عربی منطقه بسیار امید وار بودند و هستند که بین ایران و غرب جنگ در بگیرد و انها با تصوری کودکانه فکر می کنند که در چنین جنگ احتمالی حتما جمهوری اسلامی ایران شکست خواهد خورد !!!و ایران تجزیه خواهد شد !!! و سر سوزنی هم به انها صدمه وارد نخواهد شد!!!.  انها متاسفانه در توهم هالیودی بسر می برند چرا که  (بجز محدود مقامات جنگ طلب اسراییلی و برخی اشخاص در حزب جمهوری خواه امریکا و نیزبرخی مقامات عرب و غیر عرب در منطقه ) هیچ ناظر و تحلیلگر عاقل و اگاه و واقعگرایی را نمی توان یافت که واکنش و پاسخ  ایران به هر نوع حمله  را بسیار شدید و نابودگر نداند  در واقع انها معتقدند همه

جنگ طلبان بدون کمترین تردیدی در اتش و جنگی که خود مسبب شروع ان شده اند نیست و نابود خواهند شد. پس بهتر است همه مراقب گفته ها و اظهارات جنگ طلبانه خود باشند و در حد توان و جایگاه خود حرف بزنند و نه مثل رییس پلیس شهر دبی! حرفهای  نسنجیده وجنگ طلبانه ای  بر علیه ایران بزرگ  بزنند که از اندازه او و دهانش  خیلی بزرگتر باشد. خیال همه برادران ! عرب و غیر عرب همسایه راحت! با منطق گرایی و فضای مثبت منطقه ای و جهانی حاکم بر مذاکرات ایران و 1+5  تحقیقا جنگی در کار نخواهد بود و شما اگر غیر از سه جزیره ایرانی خلیج فارس هزاران بهانه و بامبول دیگر هم که بتراشید نخواهید توانست ایران و غرب را به جان هم بیندازید!.جنگ بین ایران و غرب  بنفع هیچکس نیست!. ایران می تواند برای سالها با همه متجاوزین به استقلال و  سرزمینش با قدرت غیر قابل تصور و غاقلگیرکننده دفاعی اش بجنگد!به همین دلیل همه از بروز چنین جنگی بشدت می هراسند. چرا که چنین جنگی  نه تنها منطقه  و

 محدود کشورهای جنگ طلبش که  تقریبا  بصورت بالقوه همه جهان را می تواند به اتش و خون و نابودی  بکشاند . بهر حال مقاله مثبت و  ضد جنگ لوسانجلس تامیز و اظهار نظرات خوانندگان امریکایی ان را که تقریبا همگی از سازش و کسب توافق احتمالی  بین ایران و امریکا (و گروه 1+5)شدیدا استفبال کرده اند را بزبان اصلی (انگلیسی) تقدیم می کنم  ضمنا مقاله زیر مربوط است به  جمعه 27 اپریل 2012 برابر با 9 اردیبهشت 1391

به امید صلح و برادری بیشتر بین همه کشورهای منطقه و جهان و دوری از تجاوز و جنگ و کشتار و نابودی و حمام خون!
سعید شجاعی سعدی -شیراز- ایران
========
Gary Samore, the top White House official on nuclear nonproliferation, in recent
comments has left open the door to Iranian enrichment. (Eraldo Peres, Associated Press / August 7, 2009)

    Also
    McManus: The Iran squeeze McManus: The Iran squeeze
    Iran, world powers agree to further nuclear talks Iran, world powers agree to further nuclear talks
    High stakes, low hopes for Iran nuclear talks High stakes, low hopes for Iran nuclear talks
    Iran nuclear chief expresses some flexibility Iran nuclear chief expresses some flexibility
    McManus: The nuclear countdown in Iran McManus: The nuclear countdown in Iran

By Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times

April 27, 2012, 5:28 p.m.
WASHINGTON — In what would be a significant concession, Obama administration officials say they could support allowing Iran to maintain a crucial element of its disputed nuclear program if Tehran took other major steps to curb its ability to develop a nuclear bomb.

U.S. officials said they might agree to let Iran continue enriching uranium up to 5% purity, which is the upper end of the range for most civilian uses, if its government agrees to the unrestricted inspections, strict oversight and numerous safeguards that the United Nations has long demanded.

Such a deal would face formidable obstacles. Iran has shown little willingness to meet international demands. And a shift in the U.S. position that Iran must halt all enrichment activities is likely to prompt strong objections from Israeli leaders; the probable Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney; and many members of Congress.

But a consensus has gradually emerged among U.S. and other officials that Iran is unlikely to agree to a complete halt in enrichment. Maintaining an unconditional demand that it do so could make it impossible to reach a negotiated deal to stop the country's nuclear program, thereby avoiding a military attack.

Iran has produced 210 pounds of 20%-enriched uranium for what it says are peaceful purposes, according to the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, but it has purified about 6 tons at 5% or below. Uranium is considered weapons grade at about 90% enrichment.

The question of whether to permit even low enrichment is highly sensitive for the U.S. government and its allies because of the risk that Iranian scientists still might be able to gain the knowledge and experience to someday build a bomb. But administration officials hope a new negotiating stance, backed by punishing economic sanctions, could help end the crisis.

The United States and five other world powers began talks with Iran on April 14 in Istanbul, Turkey, to try to broker a deal amid threats from Israel that it will bomb Iranian nuclear installations if the program isn't dismantled soon.

The U.S. and its allies were heartened that Iran agreed in Istanbul to keep talking; at a meeting 15 months earlier, its negotiator had refused to even discuss the country's nuclear program. Talks are scheduled to resume in Baghdad on May 23.

At least publicly, the administration had denied suggestions that it would consider approving any Iranian enrichment effort. But recently, some officials had hinted they might be willing to reevaluate that position, although with numerous caveats.

A senior administration official said that if Iran fulfills U.S. and other world powers' demands for strict enforcement of U.N. monitoring and safeguards, "there can be a discussion" of allowing low-level domestic enrichment, "and maybe we can get there, potentially."

But the official, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue, emphasized that such discussions remained only a small possibility because Iran has shown so little willingness to meet international demands.

Gary Samore, the top White House official on nuclear nonproliferation, left open the door to Iranian enrichment in recent comments, saying the decision on which parts of Tehran's program can continue "is a matter for negotiations."

"We recognize that Iran has the right to a peaceful nuclear energy program, once it has addressed concerns about its nuclear activities," Samore told Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty on April 17.

Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which says countries have a right to enrich uranium if they comply with rules to prevent bomb making. The six nations negotiating with Iran have agreed that the principles of the treaty would guide the discussions.

The U.S. and other nations are most worried about Iran's small stockpile of 20%-grade uranium. At that level, the uranium can be refined to weapons grade with relative ease.

The so-called P5-plus-1 nations negotiating with Iran — the United States, China, Russia, France, Britain and Germany — have agreed that Iran must halt all 20% enrichment and ship that stockpile out of the country. Iran also must provide full disclosure of previous nuclear work, and sign and adhere to two additional treaty protocols that provide for more vigorous oversight, they say.

But the group now appears to be moving toward allowing lower-level enrichment, according to diplomats and nonproliferation experts.

That position is contrary to the mood of many in Congress. Lawmakers in both houses have begun circulating resolutions, with support from dozens of members, that demand an end to all Iranian enrichment. One senior Senate aide involved in the issue said any deal allowing continued enrichment "would be dead on arrival" in Congress.

Over the last several years, Congress has led the push for increasingly tough sanctions against Iran, and could approve even tougher measures that would drive Tehran away from any potential deal with the U.S. and other powers.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also remains staunchly opposed. He argues that letting any centrifuges spin in Iran will allow scientists there to sharpen their mastery of nuclear science and edge toward bomb-making capability.

Israeli officials have talked of attacking Iranian's nuclear facilities before they are so advanced and hidden so deeply underground that they are invulnerable to bombs.

But Defense Minister Ehud Barak, in an interview last month with the Jerusalem Post, outlined goals that would allow Iran to retain some low-enriched uranium for nonmilitary purposes. He did not call for an end to all enrichment.

"There have been many signals lately that the red line has shifted and they're no longer pushing for full suspension," said Michael Singh, who served as President George W. Bush's top Iran advisor and who strongly opposes allowing Iran to enrich any uranium.

George Perkovich, a nonproliferation specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said he was among the U.S. hawks who believed until recently that "you have to hold the line on enrichment by Iran."

Now, he said, "that view has been overtaken by events." Iran has enriched more uranium, public support for the program is widespread, and the prospects of giving up all enrichment "has become a nationalist taboo in Iran."

[e-mail]

Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times

    Email
    print
    Comments
    20
=============
By Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times



[e-mail]

Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times

    Email
    print
    Comments
    20


phendrickson1 at 3:58 AM April 28, 2012
Let Iran have the bomb. Can they possibly be more dangerous than North Korea, Russia, Pakistan, India or more warlike tha Israel or the US?
Reply
Report Abuse
  1   0 
 
downtown dave at 2:36 AM April 28, 2012
Our prayer is that this current administration will make right decisions concerning Israel.  http://483years.blogspot.com/
Reply
Report Abuse
  0   0 
 
SiDevilIam at 1:20 AM April 28, 2012
At last, the light at the end of the tunnel. I have consistently argued this case for a peaceful negotiation. Never supported Jewish AIPAC (political-monetary) interference. Since the US supreme court has altered the law any special group or a group within a sub group can put pressure on the US government to achieve their partisan, perhaps, anti-Iran, anti-Pakistan or anti Muslim goals.
With a fear of losing a majority in the Congress or in Senate, certain unholy decisions are made. I wish that be considered as intervention in a smooth conduct of (American)democracy.
One step at a time but in the positive direction, is how I would describe this latest twist.
Diplomacy, Not Dictatorship.
...and I am Sid [e-mail]
Reply
Report Abuse
  0   1 
 
meilily at 11:58 PM April 27, 2012
N_o_t_i_c_e__the website "love~wealthy"""W_here__l_o_v_e__out__of__walls.D_a_t_i_n_g__w_i_t_h__rich __singles and Admires___o_u_t__of__y_o_u_r__r_a_c_e____.
Reply
Report Abuse
  1   2 
 
TruthandJustice1 at 11:06 PM April 27, 2012
Gary Samore looks like an Israeli.  Is he another dual citizen?
Reply
Report Abuse
  0   1 
 
TruthandJustice1 at 11:00 PM April 27, 2012
It nice to see how Western scientific rationality can finally be translated into political rationality.  What's up with this, Israel-First AIPAC?
Reply
Report Abuse
  1   1 
 
SnSinLA at 10:37 PM April 27, 2012
It's good to see the US coming to their senses and backing off the threat of attacking Iran.  Iran has not attacked anyone in over 200 years.  The same can't be said for the US or Israel.  Attacking them would be a very bad move with disastrous effects for everyone.  The "wiping Israel off the map" BS was the Zionist media version of what Ahmadinejad supposedly said, but he never said that.  Look it up.  Coexist people, don't let the money changers make you think otherwise.
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   2 
 
Procivic at 10:24 PM April 27, 2012
It's not for the U.S. or the "powers" to lay down rules for Iran's nuclear program -- that was set back in 1968 when Tehran signed the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty giving it the right to enrich uranium.
But why don't we hear about  a) rogue states that have the bomb but never signed the treaty; b) the U.S., Britain and France which in contravention of Article III supplied Israel with nuclear materials and know-how; and c)  Article VI of the treaty which stipulates that states with nuclear weapons should take steps to reduce and eliminate their stockpiles at an "early date"?
Which "powers" have been appointed to deal with the hypocrisy of it all?
Reply
Report Abuse
  1   2 
 
WhiteHeat at 10:15 PM April 27, 2012
Dozens of coutries around the world enjoy the benefits of nuclear power.  Among them are Bulgaria, Mexico, Czech Republic and even Romania.
What makes Iran different?  Israeli 'security', even though it's widely believed that Israel possess no fewer than 200 nuclear bombs.  Unfortunately, America has become a political tool of world Jewry.
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   3 
 
jon cranor at 8:45 PM April 27, 2012
Iran should allow Obama to have beer up to 3.5% .
Reply
Report Abuse
  3   0 
 
gjdflk67 at 7:25 PM April 27, 2012
TEHRAN – The Iranian ambassador to the United Nations has said that Tehran will not negotiate with the major powers over its inalienable rights.
 
Ambassador Mohammad Khazaii made the remarks during an interview with the Washington-based radio network NPR on February 9. 
 
The Islamic Republic of Iran is ready to engage in negotiations with the 5+1 group (the United States, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Germany), but it will not negotiate over its inalienable rights, Khazaii stated.
Furthermore, Iranian ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says Iran is not after acquiring military atomic technology but resolute to continue with its nuclear energy program.
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   2 
 
gjdflk67 at 7:25 PM April 27, 2012
We “will never, ever suspend our activities, including [uranium] enrichment,” he added.
IT IS THE INALIENABLE RIGHT OF EVERY SOVEREIGN STATE IN THE WORLD, INCLUDING IRAN AS STATED IN NPT TO ENRICH URANIUM.
Iran is determined to continue nuclear energy program, US sanctions against Iran over its nuclear activities have been ineffective.
He also said that Tehran will send a letter to European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who represents the six major powers in nuclear negotiations with Iran.
 
Iran is ready to hold serious talks without preconditions, he added.
IRAN WILL REFUSE A BILETERAL MEETING WITH US DUE TO NO-DIPLOMATIC-RELATIONSHIP, SANCTIONS, US RHETORICS TO BOMB IRAN AND FLORIDA, AFGHANISTAN QURAN BURNINGS.
 
But those who think that Iran will change its logical and principled policy under the pressure of sanctions, threats are mistaken, Khazaii said, adding that the Islamic Republic has never made concessions on its absolute rights.
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   1 
 
gjdflk67 at 7:24 PM April 27, 2012

Article IV of Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)
1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty.
2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   0 
 
gjdflk67 at 7:24 PM April 27, 2012

Article X. Establishes the right to withdraw from the Treaty giving 3 months' notice. It also establishes the duration of the Treaty (25 years before 1995 Extension Initiative).

UN CHARTER VII ARTICLE 51:
Provides for the right of countries to engage in military action in self-defense, including collective self-defense (i.e. under an alliance) FOR IRAN TO RETALIATE WITH EQUAL FORCE IF ATTACKED.
EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST ANTI IRAN, ANTI MUSLIM BS CREATED BY US ON BEHALF OF UNBREAKABLE BOND ISRAEL.
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   0 
 
Bloopers at 6:39 PM April 27, 2012
Israel will bomb Iran.  That attack will be the beginning of the end of the world.  Remember, this is 2012.
Reply
Report Abuse
  1   0 
 
Bloopers at 6:39 PM April 27, 2012
Apparently, Obama is giving to the desires of Iran.  Iran won't have nuclear weapons now, but they will  still have the technology to create nuclear weapons in the future.
Reply
Report Abuse
  1   0 
 
lanceman at 6:23 PM April 27, 2012
Of course, Israel will be subject to the same restrictions, right?
Reply
Report Abuse
  2   0 

vrytix at 9:07 PM April 27, 2012
A red herring.  Israel has presumably had some nukes for quite a while - and has never used them or threatened to use them in any that could be seen as offensive.
On the other hand, Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.  Granted, this just may be bluster.  But, do we, can we REALLY trust these Iranians any more than we can trust the North koreans?
Is the Iranian leadership like Saddam Hussein inasmuch as he wanted potential foes to believe that Iraq had WMD's - when it didn't?  Can we really take that chance?
Report Abuse
  1   2 

phendrickson1 at 4:02 AM April 28, 2012
Iran is all blow and no go. Remember Iraq stomped them very well 1980-88.
Report Abuse
  0   0 

phendrickson1 at 4:02 AM April 28, 2012
Iran is all blow and no go. Remember Iraq stomped them very well 1980-88.